Neuro Advantage Trainer







Home
Substance Abuse Treatment
Research
Coaching Services
Testimonials
For Licensed Professionals
FAQs
Contact Us
Disclaimer
Technology
All Products

Research & Technology

Research & Technology

Testimonials

Testimonials
Substance Abuse Treatment

Patented Technology to Empower the Mind

  

Neurotherapy as an

Adjunctive Treatment

for Substance Abuse Disorders

 Ed Pigott, Ph.D., Dennis Marikis, Ph.D., & Gregory Alter, Ph.D.

Licensed Psychologists & Principals, NeuroAdvantage, LLC
All Rights Reserved, 2007
 
Background:  

Neurotherapy encompasses a variety of drug-free technologies designed to improve brain functioning.  EEG biofeedback (also known as neurofeedback) is the most researched neurotherapy for treating substance abuse disorders.  Neurofeedback teaches people how to strengthen desired brainwave patterns to improve their ability to relax and maintain focused attention as well as develop many other positive mental states.  This learning process takes place by attaching electrodes to people’s scalps and then “feeding back” to them when the strength of desired brainwave patterns increase using an electroencephalography (EEG) machine

Over forty years worth of research has found neurofeedback effective in treating numerous conditions including ADHD, depression, and anxiety disorders among others.  Commenting on this extensive body of research, Dr. Frank Duffy (2000), Professor of Pediatric Neurology at Harvard, writes: "In my opinion, if any medication had demonstrated such a wide spectrum of effectiveness, it would be universally accepted and widely used.

Neurofeedback for Substance Abuse Disorders: 

Starting in the early 1970’s, researchers began evaluating neurofeedback’s effectiveness as an adjunctive treatment for alcoholism (e.g., Twemlow and Bowen, 1976; Twemlow, Sizemore, & Bowen, 1977).  This early research used neurofeedback to teach chronic alcoholics to strengthen their alpha and theta brainwaves (5 to 12 Hz).  High rates of alpha/theta waves are found in skilled meditators and associated with states of profound relaxation, increased spirituality, and heightened suggestibility.  During these sessions, therapists would typically give patients abstinence-oriented hypnotic suggestions and positive affirmations.  Afterwards, patients would discuss their newfound insights while the therapists worked to reinforce long-term attitudinal change. 

Table 1 presents the key findings from this research.  Summarizing across studies, these researchers found that alpha/theta training: 

  • Reliably strengthened alpha/theta waves;
  • Decreased depression and promoted positive personality changes;
  • Increased spirituality; and
  • Decreased alcohol abuse during follow-up in 67% to 93% of subjects.

Table 1

Alpha/Theta Training Outcome Studies Lacking a Control Group

 

Study

Subjects

Key Findings

Twemlow & Bowen, 1976

67 inpatient chronic male alcoholics

Increased spirituality consistent with AA’s recovery philosophy.

Twemlow et al, 1977

21 inpatient chronic male alcoholics

Reliably strengthened alpha/theta waves promoting increased insight and positive attitude change.

Saxby & Peniston, 1995

14 outpatient alcoholics with co-morbid depression

Decreased Beck Depression Scale scores and improved numerous MMCI personality scales.  21-month follow-up findings indicated sustained abstinence for 13 of 14 subjects.

Kelly, 1997

19 inpatient Navajo alcoholics (16 males; 3 females)

Three-year follow-up found that 4 (21%) meet the DSM-IV criteria for "sustained full remission", 12 (63%) for "sustained partial remission", and 3 (16%) remained alcohol "dependent."

Bodenhammer-Davis & Callaway, 2004

21 alcoholics with criminal recidivism and head injury

Two-thirds showed substantial improvements in re-arrest rates and decreased alcohol abuse during the 6 to 18 month follow-up.

 

Peniston and Kulkosky (1989) conducted the first alpha/theta training experiment with alcoholics using random assignment.  Their subjects were inpatients in a VA substance abuse program with histories of chronic alcoholism and multiple past failed treatment attempts.  Compared to the traditionally treated inpatient control group, following fifteen 30-minute alpha/theta training sessions the neurofeedback group (n=10) showed: 

  • Strengthened alpha and theta waves;
  • Greater reductions on the Beck Depression Scale;
  • Substantial positive personality changes (Peniston & Kulkosky, 1991); and
  • A dramatically lower relapse rate one year after discharge (20% versus 80% for the control group).

 

Fahrion (1995) conducted the first large controlled study of alpha/theta training for people who abused drugs other than alcohol (e.g., cocaine, marijuana, etc).  The subjects were convicted male felons in a prison-based treatment program who were randomly assigned between the traditional program and the traditional program combined with neurofeedback. 

The neurofeedback group (n=39) received alpha/theta training sessions for 30-minutes a day, five days per week for six weeks.  Compared to traditionally treated inmates, the neurofeedback group showed higher rates of positive outcomes 6 to 12 months after release from prison as measured by clean urine drug screens and violation-free participation in parole programs (67% verses 53%).  In analyzing the data, Fahrion found that African-Americans were more responsive to alpha/theta training compared to Caucasians and less responsive than Caucasians to the conventional substance abuse treatment program.  Fahrion also found that alpha/theta training was more effective for non-stimulant abusing felons and not as effective for cocaine abusers. 

Scott and Kaiser (1998) evaluated adding beta (12-18 Hz) training to alpha/theta neurofeedback for people who abused stimulant drugs.  Numerous studies have found beta training effective in treating children and adults with ADHD by increasing their ability to concentrate and decrease impulsive behaviors (Hirshberg, 2007).  ADHD has a high co-morbidity rate with substance abuse particularly when the preferred drug is a stimulant (Biederman et al, 1995).  The researchers hypothesized that beta training would enhance concentration while reducing impulsivity and thereby decrease subjects’ likelihood of dropping out before program completion. 

Scott and Kaiser randomly assigned inpatients in a 45-day substance abuse program between conventional treatment and the conventional program plus neurofeedback (n=48).  The neurofeedback group first received 10 to 20 beta training sessions to improve their cognitive functioning followed by 30 alpha/theta sessions.  Compared to conventional treatment, the neurofeedback group showed: 

  • Significant improvement in their ability to sustain attention;
  • Substantial positive personality changes including greater improvements on the MMPI’s depression, hypochondriasis, hysteria, psychasthenia, social introversion, and psychopathic deviance scales;
  • Higher treatment retention rates particularly during the initial phase of beta training when stimulant abusers are at greater risk for dropping out; and
  • Decreased likelihood of relapse following discharge.

 

Building on this earlier research, Scott and associates (2005) published in the American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse a study evaluating the effects of neurofeedback on a mixed substance abusing population.  The researchers randomly assigned subjects between the neurofeedback (N=60) and control group with the control subjects receiving additional therapist time equal to the time spent in neurofeedback training.  All subjects also participated in the facility’s “Minnesota Model” 12-step program. 

Similar to their prior study, the neurofeedback group first received 10 to 20 beta training sessions to improve their cognitive functioning followed by 30 alpha/theta sessions.  Compared to conventional treatment alone, the 60 clients randomly assigned to also receive neurofeedback showed:

·          A 41% increase in program completion (76% versus 54% for control subjects);

·          Improved ability to sustain attention and inhibit impulsive behaviors;

·          Decreased rates of anxiety, depression and psychopathic deviance; and

·          Decreased likelihood of relapse during the 12-month follow-up phase (23% versus 56% for control subjects)

Summarizing across these studies, research has found that neurofeedback training improves substance abuse treatment outcomes by: 

  • Decreasing rates of anxiety, depression, and psychopathic deviance;
  • Improving cognitive functioning and the ability to sustain attention;
  • Decreasing impulsive decision-making;
  • Improving outcomes for minorities (Fahrion, 1995; Kelly, 1997);
  • Dramatically improving program completion rates; and
  • Decreasing the likelihood of relapse.

 

Given these findings, neurofeedback is an evidenced-based intervention that warrants broad inclusion into substance abuse treatment programs.  Unfortunately while this research is compelling, neurofeedback is seldom used in actual practice because:                       

  • Neurofeedback equipment is expensive typically costing between four and six thousand dollars per machine;
  • There is a limited number of trained professionals;
  • Sessions are typically provided one-on-one versus in the group therapy format common in substance abuse treatment programs; and
  • Neurofeedback is simply too professional-time intensive and expensive for the vast majority of treatment centers to implement on a program-wide basis.

 

The NeuroAdvantage Solution: 

NeuroAdvantage, LLC is a neurotherapy technology and professional services company founded by clinical psychologists with over 50 years of cumulative neurofeedback experience.  Our key technology is the NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer.  The NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer enables people to experience the proven effectiveness of neurofeedback—without the hassles of electrodes and at an affordable price. 

Unlike neurofeedback, the NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer uses enjoyable light and sound neurotherapy (LSN) to strengthen desired brainwave patterns.  This patented technology is based on over 70 years of research and takes advantage of our brain’s natural tendency to synchronize with pleasant rhythmic stimulation. 

Using an early EEG machine, Adrian and Matthews (1934) were the first researchers to document that having subjects stare at a flickering light changed their brainwave activity.  Toman (1941), followed by Walter and Walter (1949), built on this discovery and found that the hertz (Hz) frequency that the light flickered at caused subjects’ same brainwave frequency to grow stronger. 

Since these early pioneers, numerous other neuroscientists have documented the ease with which our brains synchronize to rythmic light stimulation (e.g., Barlow, 1960; Inouye et al, 1979; Nogawa et al, 1976; Townsend et al, 1975).  Neher (1961) found that this same synchronization effect occured to repetitive sound stimualtion.  In 1999, Frederick and associates found that LSN’s combined rythmic light and sound stimulation increased the targeted brainwave pattern’s strength by an average of 38.3% in a single session alone.  A white paper summarizing this research is available at: www.neuro-advantage.com/page/851224

Budzynski and associates (1999) took this research a step further.  They compared the effectiveness of academic counseling to 30 LSN training sessions at 14 Hz (beta) for a group of struggling college students.  Their study found that these sessions not only strengthened subjects’ beta waves but that these changes persisted while the students performed challenging mental tasks.  More importantly, in the quarter following treatment termination the LSN students’ GPA improved by an average of .7 points while the comparison students’ GPA dropped by .2 points indicating that LSN training generated lasting effects. 

Depending on the Hz frequency used, clinical researchers have found that LSN is a robust treatment effective in facilitating profound relaxation and meditative states (Freedman & Marks, 1965; Glicksohn, 1986; Lewerenz, 1963; Richardson & McAndrew, 1990; Sadove, 1963; Thomas & Siever, 1989; Williams & West, 1975) as well as in promoting healing for numerous mental and physical conditions including: 

  • ADHD and Learning Problems (Carter & Russell, 1993 & 1994; Budzynski et al, 1999; Joyce & Siever, 2000; Joyce, 2001; Russell, 1997; Russell & Carter, 1997);
  • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (Berg & Siever, 2000; Trudeau et al, 1999);
  • Chronic Pain and Fibromyalgia (Boersma & Gagnon, 1992; Siever, 1999);
  • Dementia and Cognitive Decline in Seniors (Budzynski & Sherlin, 2002; Tan et al, 1997);
  • Depression in Adults and Seniors (Berg & Siever, 2007; Kumano et al, 1996; Tan et al, 1997);
  • Headaches (Anderson, 1989; Solomon, 1985);
  • Premenstrual Syndrome (Anderson et al, 1997; Noton, 1997);
  • Psychosomatic Conditions (Chijiwiina et al, 1993);
  • Seasonal Affective Disorder (Berg & Siever, 1999; Siever, 2004); and
  • Stroke (Rozelle & Budzynski, 1995; Russell, 1997).

 

Control Cravings, Reduce Depression, and Promote Positive Change: 

Research has found that for many people LSN triggers a pleasant dissociative state similar to that achieved through deep meditation and/or hypnosis.  Therapeutic dissociation is simply a “disconnect” or interruption in one’s awareness of thoughts and the passage of time thereby rejuvenating the mind.  Kroger and Schneider (1959) found that LSN induced a hypnotic trance in nearly 80% of subjects within five minutes (see figure 1).  In a large well-controlled study published in Behaviour Research and Therapy, Leonard and associates (1999) found that LSN was vastly superior (p<0.0001) in triggering dissociation compared to dot staring, a common hypnotic technique.  The NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer’s ability to rapidly trigger dissociation makes it an ideal tool for disrupting the destructive cravings and ruminative thinking that sabotage for many their road to recovery.

Bright light is increasingly recognized for its powerful beneficial effects in relieving depression.  In 2005, the American Psychiatric Association published a consensus panel report finding that light therapy had treatment effects equivalent to antidepressants for non-seasonal depression (Golden et al, 2005).  In 2006, Lam and colleagues found that light therapy was faster acting, and had fewer negative side-effects, than Prozac in treating the depression associated with seasonal affective disorder.  The NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer combines light therapy’s antidepressant effects with the ability to disrupt ruminative thinking while simultaneously strengthening desired brainwave patterns.

The NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer was designed to take advantage of these various lines of research.  Each Trainer enables users to control the light intensity and comes with 18 different LSN sessions.  Repeated three or more times per week, these Trainer sessions have the cumulative effect of enhancing overall wellbeing as well as improving the targeted areas of brain functioning. 

NeuroAdvantage has developed a special version of the Trainer to help people recover from their addictions and cravings.  This version is programmed with alpha/theta and beta training sessions designed to: 

  • Improve mental concentration and focus;
  • Decrease impulsive decision-making;
  • Control cravings;
  • Decrease depression;
  • Relax the mind and body;
  • Improve sleep; and
  • Increase the likelihood of sustained sobriety.

 

To further enhance effectiveness, NeuroAdvantage has produced a growing library of audio coaching recordings people listen to during their Trainer sessions.  These recordings cover a variety of topics and use positive suggestions, affirmations, and guided visualizations to help people make desired changes in their lives.  Titles include:

  • 12-Steps To Recovery Series
  • Control Cravings
  • Mindfulness Meditation
  • Positive Thinking
  • Beating the Blues
  • Manage Your Pain
  • Deep Sleep
  • Stop Smoking
  • Overcome Avoidance
  • Healthy Eating
  • Enjoying Exercise
  • Deep Relaxation

 

The NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer is portable, affordable, and easy to use.  The Trainer is particularly helpful for people working to recover from addictions and cravings.  In addition to its immediate positive impact, Trainer sessions provide a 22 to 30 minute structured intervention with audio coaching for people to use whenever they become vulnerable to relapse. 

The NeuroAdvantage™ Recovery Program: 

NeuroAdvantage desires to partner with treatment centers interested in incorporating LSN into their programs.  While NeuroAdvantage psychologists have successfully used the Trainer in helping numerous people overcome their addictions and cravings, at present there are no studies evaluating its effectiveness for these conditions.  It is important therefore to first implement the NeuroAdvantage™ Recovery program on a pilot basis while carefully monitoring its impact. 

Depending on the center’s structure and client needs, the NeuroAdvantage™ Recovery program is implemented in either an individual or group therapy format with up to twelve clients at a time.  Due to its ease of use, the Trainer is also suitable for clients to use at home.

The NeuroAdvantage™ Recovery program includes: 

  • Consulting with management on the optimal way to incorporate LSN into its programs;
  • Presenting to staff the research and clinical rationale for using LSN as an adjunctive treatment with substance abuse clients;
  • Training clinicians how to use the Trainer with different subpopulations of clients;
  • Providing telephonic and on-site consultation on an as needed basis;
  • Providing appropriate NeuroAdvantage audio recordings for use during sessions;
  • Consulting with management in developing an aftercare model that incorporates the appropriate use of the Trainer and NeuroAdvantage’s telephonic coaching service;
  • Assisting management in conducting outcome studies; and
  • Assisting management in marketing the NeuroAdvantage™ Recovery component of its programs.

 

Contraindications: 

The NeuroAdvantage Trainer should not be used by people with a history of epilepsy, light-stimulated seizures, or high light sensitivity.  Although LSN machines have been used for decades—with tens of thousands of people experiencing their benefits—it is possible for LSN to trigger a light-stimulated seizure in the same way that strobe lights do in approximately one in ten thousand people.  This risk is minimized by proper screening since those few adults at risk for such seizures have typically already experienced one through other activities (e.g., disco dancing with strobe lights; watching a flickering TV screen; etc.).  

References:

Adrian, E.D. & Matthews, B.H. (1934).  The Berger rhythm:  Potential changes from the occipital lobes of man.  Brain, 57: 355-385.

Anderson, D.J. (1989). The treatment of migraine headaches with variable frequency photo-stimulation. Headache, 29: 154-155.

Anderson, D.J, Legg, N.J., & Ridout, D.A. (1997).  Preliminary trial of photic stimulation for premenstrual syndrome. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 17(1): 76-79.

Barlow, J.S. (1960). Rhythmic activity induced by photic stimulation in relation to intrinsical activity of the brain in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 12: 317-326.

Berg, K. & Siever, D. (1999).  The effect of audio-visual entrainment on seasonal affective disorder in a northern latitude.  Journal of Neurotherapy, 4.

Berg, K. & Siever, D. (2000). The treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome with audio-visual entrainment. Presentation at AAPB 31st Annual Meeting. Denver, CO.

Berg, K. & Siever, D. (2007). The effect of audio-visual entrainment in depressed community-dwelling seniors who fall.  Manuscript submitted for publication.

Biederman, J., Wilens, T., Mick, E., Milberger, S., Spencer, T.J., & Farone, S.V. (1995).  Psychoactive substance abuse disorders in adults with ADHD:  Effects of ADHD and psychiatric comorbidity.  American Journal of Psychiatry, 152(11): 1652-1658.

Bodenhammer-Davis, E. & Callaway, T. (2004).  Extended follow-up of Peniston protocol results with chemical dependency.  Journal of Neurotherapy, 8 (2): 135.

Boersma, F.J., & Gagnon, C. (1992). The use of repetitive audio-visual entrainment in the management of chronic pain. Medical Hypnoanalysis Journal, 7: 80-97.

Budzynski, T., Jordy, J., Budzynski, H., Tang, H., & Claypoole, K. (1999). Academic performance enhancement with photic stimulation and EDR feedback. Journal of Neurotherpy, 3(3): 11-21.

Budzynski, T. & Sherlin, L. (2002).  Audio-visual stimulation effects in an Alzheimer’s patient as documented by QEEG and LORETA.  Journal of Neurotherapy, 6: 54-56.

Carter, J. & Russell, H. (1993). A pilot investigation of audio and visual entrainment of brainwave activity in learning disabled boys.  Texas Researcher, 4: 65-72.

Carter, J. & Russell, H. (1994).  An audio-visual stimulation unit with EEG biofeedback for treatment of learning disabilities:  Final report.  Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education SBIR Phase I Contract Number: RN 93082027.

Chijiwiina, M. et al, (1993).  Application of photic feedback system to psychosomatic medicine.  Japanese Society of Biofeedback Research, 29-37.

Duffy, F. (2000). Editorial.  Clinical Electroencephalography, 31(1): 5.

Fahrion, S.L. (1995). Human potential and personal transformation.  Subtle Energies, 6: 55-88.

Frederick, J., Lubar, J., Rasey, H., Brim, S., & Blackburn, J. (1999). Effects of 18.5 Hz audiovisual stimulation on EEG amplitude at the vertex. Journal of Neurotherapy, 3 (3): 23-27.

Freedman, S. & Marks, P. (1965).  Visual imagery produced by rhythmic photic stimulation:  Personality correlates and phenomenology.  British Journal of Psychology, 56: 95-112.

Glicksohn, J. (1986). Photic driving and altered states of consciousness:  An exploratory study.  Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 6: 167-182.

Golden, R.N. et al (2005).  The efficacy of light therapy in the treatment of mood disorders:  A review and meta-analysis of the evidence.  American Journal of Psychiatry, 162: 656–662.

Inouye, T.,  Sumitsuji, N., & Matsumoto, K. (1979). EEG changes induced by light stimuli modulated with the subject’s alpha rhythm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 49: 135-142.

Joyce, M., & Siever, D. (2000). Audio-visual entrainment program as a treatment for behavior disorders in a school setting. Journal of Neurotherapy, 4(2): 9-25.

Joyce, M. (2001).  New Vision School.  Report to the Minnesota Department of Education.

Kelly, M.J. (1997). Native Americans, neurofeedback, and substance abuse theory:  Three-year outcome of alpha/theta neurofeedback training in the treatment of problem drinking among Dine=(Navajo) people.  Journal of Neurotherapy, 2 (3): 24-60.

Kroger, W.S., & Schneider, S.A. (1959). An electronic aid for hypnotic induction:  A preliminary report. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 7: 93-98.

Kumano, H., Horie, H., Shidara, T., Kuboki, T., Suematsu, H., & Kindschi, C.L. (1996).  Treatment of a depressive disorder patient with EEG-driven photic stimulation. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 21: 323-334.

Lam, R.W. et al (2006).  The Can-SAD study:  A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of light therapy and fluoxetine in patients with winter seasonal affective disorder.  American Journal of Psychiatry; 163: 805–812.

Leonard, K.N., Telch, M.J., & Harrington P.J. (1999).  Dissociation in the laboratory:  A comparison of strategies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37: 49-61.

Lewerenz, C. (1963). A factual report on the brain wave synchronizer. Hypnosis Quarterly, 6(4): 23.

Neher, A. (1961). Auditory driving observed with scalp electrodes in normal subjects. Electroencephaloqraphy and Clinical Neurophysioloqy, 13: 449-451.

Nogawa, T., Katayama, K., Tabata, Y., Ohshio, T., & Kawahara, T. (1976). Changes in amplitude of the EEG induced by a photic stimulus. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 40: 78-88.

Noton, D. (1997). PMS, EEG, and photic stimulation.  Journal of Neurotherapy, 2(2): 8-13.

Peniston, E.G., & Kulkosky, P.J. (1989). Alpha-theta brainwave training and beta-endorphin levels in alcoholics.  Alcohol: Clinical & Experimental Research, 13(2): 271-279.

Peniston, E.G., & Kulkosky, P.J. (1991). Alcoholic personality and alpha-theta brainwave training. Medical Psychotherapy, 2(1): 37-55.

Richardson, A. & McAndrew, F. (1990).  The effects of photic stimulation and private self-consciousness on the complexity of visual imagination imagery. British Journal of Psychology, 81: 381-394.

Rozelle, G.R., & Budzynski, T.H. (1995). Neurotherapy for stroke rehabilitation: A single case study. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 20: 211-228.

Russell, H.L. (1997). Intellectual functioning, auditory and photic stimulation and changes in functioning in children and adults. Biofeedback, 25: 16-24.

Russell, H. & Carter, J. (1997).  EEG Driven audio-visual stimulation unit for enhancing cognitive abilities of learning disordered boys: Final report.  Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education SBIR Phase II Contract Number: RA94130002.

Sadove, M.S. (1963). Hypnosis in anaesthesiology. Illinois Medical Journal, 39-42.

Saxby, E., & Peniston, E.G. (1995).  Alpha-theta brainwave neurofeedback training:  An effective treatment for male and female alcoholics with depressive symptoms.  Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(5): 685-693.

Scott, W., & Kaiser, D. (1998). Augmenting chemical dependency treatment with neurofeedback training.  Journal of Neurotherapy, 3(1): 66.

Scott, W., Kaiser, D. Othmer, S. & Sideroff, S. (2005).  Effects of an EEG biofeedback protocol on a mixed substance abusing population.  American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 31(3): 455-469.

Siever, D. (1999).  Fibromyalgia syndrome symptom reduction with audio-visual entrainment.  Journal of Neurotherapy, 4: 70.

Siever, D. (2004).  The application of audio-visual entrainment for seasonal affective disorder. Biofeedback, 32: 32-35.

Solomon G.D. (1985).  Slow wave photic stimulation in the treatment of headache:  A preliminary study. Headache, 25: 444-446.

Tan, G., Kelly, J., Calhoun, W., Artymiak, K., & Ghusn, H. (1997). Brain stimulation to improve cognition and mood of geriatric patients with dementia. Presented at the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting. San Diego, CA.

Thomas, N. & Siever, D. (1989).  The effect of repetitive audio/visual stimulation on skeletomotor and vasomotor activity.  Hypnosis: 4th European Congress at Oxford.  London: Whurr Publishers.

Toman, J. (1941). Flicker potentials and the alpha rhythm in man.  Journal of Neurophysiology, 4: 51-61.

Townsend, R.E., Lubin, A., & Naitoh, P. (1975).  Stabilization of alpha frequency by sinusoidally modulated light.  Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysioloqy, 39: 515-518.

Trudeau, D.L., Moore, J., Stockley, H., & Rubin, Y. (1999).  A pilot study of the effect of 18 Hz audio visual stimulation (AVS) on attention and concentration symptoms and on quantitative EEG (QEEG) in long term chronic fatigue (CFS).  Journal of Neurotherapy, 3: 76.

Twemlow, S.W., & Bowen, W.T. (1976).  EEG biofeedback induced self-actualization in alcoholics.  Journal of Biofeedback, 3: 20-25.

Twemlow, S.W., Sizemore, D.G., & Bowen, W.T. (1977).  Biofeedback induced energy redistribution in the alcoholic EEG.  Journal of Biofeedback, 3: 14-19.

Walter, V.J. & Walter, W.G. (1949). The central effects of rhythmic sensory stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1: 57-86.

Williams, P. & West, M. (1975).  EEG responses to photic stimulation in persons experienced in meditation.  Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39: 519-522.

 

 

Shopping Cart

Items 0
Subtotal $0.00
Note: All prices in US Dollars
Add to Email List
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:

Search our Site




Copyright © Neuro Advantage Trainer Richmond, CA
Resource Links
ed@neuro-advantage.com