Patented Technology to Empower
the Mind
Neurotherapy as an
Adjunctive Treatment
for Substance Abuse
Disorders
Ed Pigott, Ph.D., Dennis Marikis, Ph.D., & Gregory Alter, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologists & Principals,
NeuroAdvantage, LLC
All Rights Reserved, 2007
Background:
Neurotherapy encompasses a variety of drug-free technologies
designed to improve brain functioning. EEG
biofeedback (also known as neurofeedback) is the most
researched neurotherapy for treating substance abuse disorders. Neurofeedback teaches people how to
strengthen desired brainwave patterns to improve their ability to relax and
maintain focused attention as well as develop many other positive mental
states. This learning process takes
place by attaching electrodes to people’s scalps and then “feeding back” to
them when the strength of desired brainwave patterns increase using an electroencephalography (EEG) machine.
Over forty years
worth of research has found neurofeedback effective in treating numerous
conditions including ADHD, depression, and anxiety disorders among others. Commenting on this extensive body of research,
Dr. Frank Duffy (2000), Professor of Pediatric Neurology at Harvard, writes: "In my opinion, if any medication
had demonstrated such a wide spectrum of effectiveness, it would be universally
accepted and widely used."
Neurofeedback
for Substance Abuse Disorders:
Starting in the early 1970’s, researchers began evaluating
neurofeedback’s effectiveness as an adjunctive treatment
for alcoholism (e.g., Twemlow and Bowen, 1976; Twemlow, Sizemore, & Bowen,
1977). This early research used
neurofeedback to teach chronic alcoholics to strengthen their alpha and theta
brainwaves (5 to 12 Hz). High rates of
alpha/theta waves are found in skilled meditators and associated with states of
profound relaxation, increased spirituality, and heightened
suggestibility. During these sessions,
therapists would typically give patients abstinence-oriented hypnotic
suggestions and positive affirmations.
Afterwards, patients would discuss their newfound insights while the
therapists worked to reinforce long-term attitudinal change.
Table 1 presents the key findings from this research. Summarizing across studies, these researchers
found that alpha/theta training:
- Reliably strengthened alpha/theta waves;
- Decreased depression and promoted positive personality
changes;
- Increased spirituality; and
- Decreased alcohol abuse during follow-up in
67% to 93% of subjects.
Table
1
Alpha/Theta Training Outcome
Studies Lacking a Control Group
|
Study
|
Subjects
|
Key
Findings
|
|
Twemlow & Bowen, 1976
|
67 inpatient chronic male alcoholics
|
Increased spirituality consistent
with AA’s recovery philosophy.
|
|
Twemlow et al, 1977
|
21 inpatient chronic male alcoholics
|
Reliably strengthened alpha/theta waves
promoting increased insight and positive attitude change.
|
|
Saxby & Peniston, 1995
|
14 outpatient alcoholics with
co-morbid depression
|
Decreased Beck Depression Scale scores
and improved numerous MMCI personality scales. 21-month follow-up findings indicated
sustained abstinence for 13 of 14 subjects.
|
|
Kelly, 1997
|
19 inpatient Navajo alcoholics (16
males; 3 females)
|
Three-year
follow-up found that 4 (21%) meet
the DSM-IV criteria for "sustained full remission", 12 (63%) for
"sustained partial remission", and 3 (16%) remained alcohol
"dependent."
|
|
Bodenhammer-Davis & Callaway,
2004
|
21 alcoholics with criminal
recidivism and head injury
|
Two-thirds showed substantial
improvements in re-arrest rates and decreased alcohol abuse during the 6 to
18 month follow-up.
|
Peniston and Kulkosky (1989) conducted the first alpha/theta
training experiment with alcoholics using random assignment. Their subjects were inpatients in a VA
substance abuse program with histories of chronic alcoholism and multiple past
failed treatment attempts. Compared to
the traditionally treated inpatient control group, following fifteen 30-minute
alpha/theta training sessions the neurofeedback group (n=10) showed:
- Strengthened
alpha and theta waves;
- Greater
reductions on the Beck Depression Scale;
- Substantial
positive personality changes (Peniston & Kulkosky, 1991); and
- A
dramatically lower relapse rate one year after discharge (20% versus 80%
for the control group).
Fahrion (1995) conducted the first large controlled study of
alpha/theta training for people who abused drugs other than alcohol (e.g.,
cocaine, marijuana, etc). The subjects
were convicted male felons in a prison-based treatment program who were
randomly assigned between the traditional program and the traditional program
combined with neurofeedback.
The neurofeedback group (n=39) received alpha/theta training
sessions for 30-minutes a day, five days per week for six weeks. Compared to traditionally treated inmates,
the neurofeedback group showed higher rates of positive outcomes 6 to 12 months
after release from prison as measured by clean urine drug screens and
violation-free participation in parole programs (67% verses 53%). In analyzing the data, Fahrion found that
African-Americans were more responsive to alpha/theta training compared to
Caucasians and less responsive than Caucasians to the conventional substance
abuse treatment program. Fahrion also
found that alpha/theta training was more effective for non-stimulant abusing
felons and not as effective for cocaine abusers.
Scott and Kaiser (1998) evaluated adding beta (12-18 Hz)
training to alpha/theta neurofeedback for people who abused stimulant
drugs. Numerous studies have found beta
training effective in treating children and adults with ADHD by increasing
their ability to concentrate and decrease impulsive behaviors (Hirshberg,
2007). ADHD has a high co-morbidity rate
with substance abuse particularly when the preferred drug is a stimulant (Biederman
et al, 1995). The researchers hypothesized
that beta training would enhance concentration while reducing impulsivity and
thereby decrease subjects’ likelihood of dropping out before program
completion.
Scott and Kaiser randomly assigned inpatients in a 45-day
substance abuse program between conventional treatment and the conventional
program plus neurofeedback (n=48). The
neurofeedback group first received 10 to 20 beta training sessions to improve
their cognitive functioning followed by 30 alpha/theta sessions. Compared to conventional treatment, the
neurofeedback group showed:
- Significant
improvement in their ability to sustain attention;
- Substantial
positive personality changes including greater improvements on the MMPI’s depression,
hypochondriasis, hysteria, psychasthenia, social introversion, and
psychopathic deviance scales;
- Higher
treatment retention rates particularly during the initial phase of beta training
when stimulant abusers are at greater risk for dropping out; and
- Decreased
likelihood of relapse following discharge.
Building
on this earlier research, Scott and associates (2005) published in the American
Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse a study evaluating the effects of
neurofeedback on a mixed substance abusing population. The researchers randomly assigned subjects between
the neurofeedback (N=60) and control group with the control subjects receiving additional
therapist time equal to the time spent in neurofeedback training. All
subjects also participated in the facility’s “Minnesota Model” 12-step program.
Similar to their prior study, the neurofeedback group first received 10 to 20 beta training
sessions to improve their cognitive functioning followed by 30 alpha/theta
sessions. Compared to conventional treatment alone, the 60
clients randomly assigned to also receive neurofeedback showed:
·
A 41% increase in program completion (76% versus 54%
for control subjects);
·
Improved ability to sustain attention and inhibit impulsive
behaviors;
·
Decreased rates of anxiety, depression and
psychopathic deviance; and
·
Decreased likelihood of relapse during the 12-month
follow-up phase (23% versus 56% for control subjects)
Summarizing across these studies, research has found that
neurofeedback training improves substance abuse treatment outcomes by:
- Decreasing rates of
anxiety, depression, and psychopathic deviance;
- Improving cognitive
functioning and the ability to sustain attention;
- Decreasing impulsive
decision-making;
- Improving outcomes for minorities (Fahrion,
1995; Kelly, 1997);
- Dramatically improving program completion rates;
and
- Decreasing the
likelihood of relapse.
Given these findings, neurofeedback is an evidenced-based
intervention that warrants broad inclusion into substance abuse treatment
programs. Unfortunately while this
research is compelling, neurofeedback is seldom used in actual practice
because:
- Neurofeedback
equipment is expensive typically costing between four and six thousand
dollars per machine;
- There
is a limited number of trained professionals;
- Sessions
are typically provided one-on-one versus in the group therapy format
common in substance abuse treatment programs; and
- Neurofeedback
is simply too professional-time intensive and expensive for the vast
majority of treatment centers to implement on a program-wide basis.
The
NeuroAdvantage Solution:
NeuroAdvantage, LLC is a neurotherapy technology and professional
services company founded by clinical psychologists with over 50 years of
cumulative neurofeedback experience. Our
key technology is the NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer. The NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer enables people to experience
the proven effectiveness of neurofeedback—without the hassles of electrodes and at an
affordable price.
Unlike neurofeedback, the NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer uses enjoyable light and
sound neurotherapy (LSN) to strengthen desired brainwave patterns. This patented technology is based on over 70 years of
research and takes advantage of our brain’s natural tendency to
synchronize with pleasant rhythmic stimulation.
Using an early EEG machine, Adrian and Matthews
(1934) were the first researchers to document that having subjects stare at a flickering
light changed their brainwave activity. Toman (1941), followed by Walter
and Walter (1949), built on this discovery and found that the hertz (Hz)
frequency that the light flickered at caused subjects’ same brainwave frequency
to grow stronger.
Since these early pioneers, numerous
other neuroscientists have documented the ease with which our brains synchronize
to rythmic light stimulation (e.g., Barlow, 1960; Inouye et al,
1979; Nogawa et al, 1976; Townsend et al, 1975). Neher (1961) found that this same
synchronization effect occured to repetitive sound stimualtion. In 1999, Frederick and associates found that LSN’s
combined rythmic light and sound stimulation increased the targeted brainwave
pattern’s strength by an average of 38.3% in a single session alone.
A white paper summarizing this research is available at: www.neuro-advantage.com/page/851224.
Budzynski and associates (1999) took this research a step
further. They compared the effectiveness
of academic counseling to 30 LSN training sessions at 14 Hz (beta) for a group
of struggling college students. Their
study found that these sessions not only strengthened subjects’ beta waves but
that these changes persisted while the students performed challenging mental
tasks. More importantly, in the quarter
following treatment termination the LSN students’ GPA improved by an average of
.7 points while the comparison students’ GPA dropped by .2 points indicating
that LSN training generated lasting effects.
Depending on the Hz frequency used, clinical researchers
have found that LSN is a robust treatment effective in facilitating profound relaxation
and meditative states (Freedman & Marks, 1965; Glicksohn, 1986; Lewerenz, 1963;
Richardson & McAndrew, 1990; Sadove, 1963;
Thomas & Siever, 1989; Williams & West, 1975) as well as in promoting healing for numerous
mental and physical conditions including:
- ADHD and
Learning Problems (Carter & Russell, 1993
& 1994; Budzynski et al, 1999; Joyce & Siever, 2000; Joyce, 2001; Russell, 1997; Russell
& Carter, 1997);
- Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome (Berg
& Siever, 2000; Trudeau
et al, 1999);
- Chronic Pain and Fibromyalgia (Boersma & Gagnon, 1992;
Siever, 1999);
- Dementia and Cognitive Decline in Seniors
(Budzynski &
Sherlin, 2002; Tan et al, 1997);
- Depression in Adults and Seniors (Berg
& Siever, 2007; Kumano et al, 1996; Tan et al, 1997);
- Headaches
(Anderson, 1989; Solomon, 1985);
- Premenstrual Syndrome
(Anderson et al, 1997; Noton, 1997);
- Psychosomatic
Conditions (Chijiwiina et al, 1993);
- Seasonal Affective Disorder (Berg & Siever, 1999; Siever, 2004); and
- Stroke
(Rozelle &
Budzynski, 1995; Russell, 1997).
Control
Cravings, Reduce Depression, and Promote Positive Change:
Research
has found that for many people LSN triggers a pleasant dissociative state similar to that
achieved through deep meditation and/or hypnosis. Therapeutic dissociation is simply a
“disconnect” or interruption in one’s awareness of thoughts and the passage of
time thereby rejuvenating the mind. Kroger
and Schneider (1959) found that LSN induced a hypnotic trance in nearly 80% of subjects within five minutes (see figure 1). In a large well-controlled study published in
Behaviour Research and Therapy, Leonard
and associates (1999) found that LSN was vastly superior (p<0.0001) in triggering dissociation compared to dot
staring, a common hypnotic technique. The NeuroAdvantage™
Trainer’s ability to rapidly trigger dissociation makes it an ideal tool for disrupting the destructive
cravings and ruminative thinking that sabotage for many their road to recovery.
Bright light is increasingly
recognized for its powerful beneficial effects in relieving depression. In 2005, the American Psychiatric Association
published a consensus panel report finding that light therapy had treatment effects
equivalent to antidepressants for non-seasonal depression (Golden et al, 2005). In 2006, Lam and colleagues found that light
therapy was faster acting, and had fewer negative side-effects, than Prozac in
treating the depression associated with seasonal affective disorder. The NeuroAdvantage™
Trainer combines light therapy’s
antidepressant effects with the ability to disrupt
ruminative thinking while simultaneously strengthening desired brainwave
patterns.
The NeuroAdvantage™ Trainer was designed to take advantage of these various lines
of research. Each Trainer enables users to
control the light intensity and comes with 18 different LSN sessions. Repeated three or more times per week, these Trainer
sessions have the cumulative effect of enhancing overall wellbeing as well as
improving the targeted areas of brain functioning.
NeuroAdvantage has developed a
special version of the Trainer to help people
recover from their addictions and cravings. This version is programmed with alpha/theta
and beta training sessions designed to:
- Improve
mental concentration and focus;
- Decrease
impulsive decision-making;
- Control
cravings;
- Decrease
depression;
- Relax
the mind and body;
- Improve
sleep; and
- Increase
the likelihood of sustained sobriety.
To further
enhance effectiveness, NeuroAdvantage
has produced a growing library of audio coaching recordings people listen to
during their Trainer sessions. These recordings cover a variety of topics
and use positive suggestions, affirmations, and guided visualizations to help
people make desired changes in their lives.
Titles include:
- 12-Steps To
Recovery Series
- Control Cravings
- Mindfulness Meditation
- Positive Thinking
- Beating the Blues
- Manage Your Pain
- Deep Sleep
- Stop Smoking
- Overcome Avoidance
- Healthy Eating
- Enjoying Exercise
- Deep Relaxation
The NeuroAdvantage™
Trainer
is portable, affordable, and easy to use.
The Trainer is
particularly helpful for people working to recover from addictions and
cravings. In addition to its immediate
positive impact, Trainer
sessions provide a 22 to 30 minute structured intervention with audio coaching for
people to use whenever they become vulnerable to relapse.
The
NeuroAdvantage™ Recovery Program:
NeuroAdvantage
desires to partner with treatment centers interested in incorporating LSN
into their programs. While NeuroAdvantage psychologists have
successfully used the Trainer in helping numerous people
overcome their addictions and cravings, at present there are no studies evaluating
its effectiveness for these conditions. It
is important therefore to first implement the NeuroAdvantage™ Recovery program on a pilot basis while
carefully monitoring its impact.
Depending on the center’s structure and client needs, the NeuroAdvantage™ Recovery program is implemented
in either an individual or group therapy format with up to twelve clients at a
time. Due to its ease of
use, the Trainer is also suitable for clients to use at
home.
The NeuroAdvantage™ Recovery
program includes:
- Consulting
with management on the optimal way to incorporate LSN into its programs;
- Presenting
to staff the research and clinical rationale for using LSN as an
adjunctive treatment with substance abuse clients;
- Training
clinicians how to use the Trainer
with different subpopulations of clients;
- Providing
telephonic and on-site consultation on an as needed basis;
- Providing
appropriate NeuroAdvantage audio
recordings for use during sessions;
- Consulting with management in
developing an aftercare model that incorporates the appropriate use of the
Trainer
and NeuroAdvantage’s
telephonic coaching service;
- Assisting
management in conducting outcome studies; and
- Assisting
management in marketing the NeuroAdvantage™ Recovery component of its programs.
Contraindications:
The NeuroAdvantage™
Trainer should not be used by people with a history of epilepsy,
light-stimulated seizures, or high light sensitivity. Although LSN
machines have been used for decades—with tens of thousands of people
experiencing their benefits—it is possible for LSN to trigger a
light-stimulated seizure in the same way that strobe lights do in approximately
one in ten thousand people. This risk is minimized by proper
screening since those few adults at risk for such seizures have typically
already experienced one through other activities (e.g., disco dancing with
strobe lights; watching a flickering TV screen; etc.).
References:
Adrian, E.D. & Matthews, B.H. (1934). The Berger rhythm: Potential changes from the occipital lobes of
man. Brain, 57: 355-385.
Anderson, D.J. (1989). The treatment of migraine headaches
with variable frequency photo-stimulation. Headache, 29: 154-155.
Anderson, D.J, Legg, N.J.,
& Ridout, D.A. (1997). Preliminary
trial of photic stimulation for premenstrual syndrome. Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, 17(1): 76-79.
Barlow, J.S. (1960). Rhythmic activity induced by photic
stimulation in relation to intrinsical activity of the brain in man. Electroencephalography
and Clinical Neurophysiology, 12: 317-326.
Berg, K. & Siever, D. (1999). The
effect of audio-visual entrainment on seasonal affective disorder in a northern
latitude. Journal of Neurotherapy, 4.
Berg, K. & Siever, D. (2000). The treatment of chronic
fatigue syndrome with audio-visual entrainment. Presentation at AAPB 31st
Annual Meeting. Denver, CO.
Berg, K. & Siever, D. (2007). The effect of audio-visual
entrainment in depressed community-dwelling seniors who fall. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Biederman, J., Wilens, T., Mick, E., Milberger, S.,
Spencer, T.J., & Farone, S.V. (1995).
Psychoactive substance abuse disorders in adults with ADHD: Effects of ADHD and psychiatric
comorbidity. American Journal of Psychiatry,
152(11): 1652-1658.
Bodenhammer-Davis, E. & Callaway, T. (2004). Extended follow-up of Peniston protocol
results with chemical dependency. Journal
of Neurotherapy, 8 (2): 135.
Boersma,
F.J., & Gagnon, C. (1992). The use of repetitive audio-visual entrainment in the management of
chronic pain. Medical Hypnoanalysis Journal, 7: 80-97.
Budzynski, T., Jordy, J., Budzynski, H., Tang, H., &
Claypoole, K. (1999). Academic performance enhancement with photic stimulation
and EDR feedback. Journal of Neurotherpy, 3(3): 11-21.
Budzynski, T. & Sherlin, L. (2002). Audio-visual stimulation effects in an
Alzheimer’s patient as documented by QEEG and LORETA. Journal of Neurotherapy, 6: 54-56.
Carter, J. & Russell, H. (1993). A pilot investigation
of audio and visual entrainment of brainwave activity in learning disabled
boys. Texas Researcher, 4:
65-72.
Carter, J. & Russell, H. (1994). An
audio-visual stimulation unit with EEG biofeedback for treatment of learning
disabilities: Final report. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of Education SBIR
Phase I Contract Number: RN 93082027.
Chijiwiina, M. et al, (1993). Application of photic feedback system to
psychosomatic medicine. Japanese
Society of Biofeedback Research, 29-37.
Duffy, F. (2000). Editorial. Clinical Electroencephalography,
31(1): 5.
Fahrion, S.L. (1995). Human potential and personal
transformation. Subtle Energies, 6:
55-88.
Frederick, J., Lubar, J., Rasey, H., Brim,
S., & Blackburn, J. (1999). Effects of
18.5 Hz audiovisual stimulation on EEG amplitude at the vertex. Journal
of Neurotherapy, 3 (3): 23-27.
Freedman, S. & Marks, P. (1965). Visual imagery produced by rhythmic photic
stimulation: Personality correlates and
phenomenology. British Journal of Psychology,
56: 95-112.
Glicksohn, J. (1986). Photic driving and altered states of
consciousness: An exploratory study. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 6:
167-182.
Golden,
R.N. et al (2005). The efficacy of light therapy in the
treatment of mood disorders: A review
and meta-analysis of the evidence. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 162: 656–662.
Inouye, T.,
Sumitsuji, N., & Matsumoto, K. (1979). EEG changes induced by light
stimuli modulated with the subject’s alpha rhythm. Electroencephalography and
Clinical Neurophysiology, 49: 135-142.
Joyce, M., & Siever, D. (2000). Audio-visual
entrainment program as a treatment for behavior disorders in a school setting. Journal
of Neurotherapy, 4(2): 9-25.
Joyce, M. (2001). New
Vision School.
Report to the Minnesota Department of Education.
Kelly, M.J. (1997). Native Americans, neurofeedback, and
substance abuse theory: Three-year
outcome of alpha/theta neurofeedback training in the treatment of problem
drinking among Dine=(Navajo) people. Journal
of Neurotherapy, 2 (3): 24-60.
Kroger, W.S., & Schneider,
S.A. (1959). An
electronic aid for hypnotic induction: A
preliminary report. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 7:
93-98.
Kumano, H., Horie, H., Shidara, T., Kuboki, T., Suematsu,
H., & Kindschi, C.L. (1996).
Treatment of a depressive disorder patient with EEG-driven photic stimulation.
Biofeedback
and Self-Regulation, 21: 323-334.
Lam, R.W.
et al (2006). The Can-SAD study: A randomized
controlled trial of the effectiveness of light therapy and fluoxetine in patients
with winter seasonal affective disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry; 163: 805–812.
Leonard, K.N., Telch, M.J., & Harrington
P.J. (1999). Dissociation in the laboratory: A comparison of strategies. Behaviour
Research and Therapy, 37: 49-61.
Lewerenz, C. (1963). A factual report on the brain wave
synchronizer. Hypnosis Quarterly, 6(4): 23.
Neher, A. (1961). Auditory driving observed with scalp
electrodes in normal subjects. Electroencephaloqraphy and Clinical
Neurophysioloqy, 13: 449-451.
Nogawa, T.,
Katayama, K., Tabata, Y., Ohshio, T., & Kawahara, T. (1976). Changes
in amplitude of the EEG induced by a photic stimulus. Electroencephalography and
Clinical Neurophysiology, 40: 78-88.
Noton, D. (1997). PMS, EEG, and photic stimulation. Journal of Neurotherapy, 2(2): 8-13.
Peniston, E.G., & Kulkosky, P.J. (1989). Alpha-theta
brainwave training and beta-endorphin levels in alcoholics. Alcohol: Clinical & Experimental
Research, 13(2): 271-279.
Peniston, E.G., & Kulkosky, P.J. (1991). Alcoholic
personality and alpha-theta brainwave training. Medical Psychotherapy,
2(1): 37-55.
Richardson, A. & McAndrew, F.
(1990). The effects of photic
stimulation and private self-consciousness on the complexity of visual
imagination imagery. British Journal
of Psychology, 81: 381-394.
Rozelle, G.R., & Budzynski, T.H. (1995). Neurotherapy
for stroke rehabilitation: A single case study. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 20: 211-228.
Russell, H.L. (1997). Intellectual functioning, auditory
and photic stimulation and changes in functioning in children and adults. Biofeedback, 25: 16-24.
Russell, H. & Carter, J. (1997). EEG Driven audio-visual stimulation unit
for enhancing cognitive abilities of learning disordered boys: Final report. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of Education SBIR Phase II Contract Number: RA94130002.
Sadove, M.S. (1963). Hypnosis in
anaesthesiology. Illinois Medical Journal, 39-42.
Saxby, E., & Peniston, E.G. (1995). Alpha-theta brainwave neurofeedback
training: An effective treatment for
male and female alcoholics with depressive symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychology,
51(5): 685-693.
Scott, W., & Kaiser, D. (1998). Augmenting chemical
dependency treatment with neurofeedback training. Journal of Neurotherapy, 3(1): 66.
Scott, W., Kaiser, D. Othmer, S. & Sideroff, S.
(2005). Effects of an EEG biofeedback
protocol on a mixed substance abusing population. American
Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 31(3): 455-469.
Siever, D. (1999). Fibromyalgia syndrome symptom reduction with
audio-visual entrainment. Journal
of Neurotherapy, 4: 70.
Siever, D. (2004).
The application of audio-visual entrainment for seasonal affective
disorder. Biofeedback, 32: 32-35.
Solomon G.D.
(1985). Slow wave photic stimulation in
the treatment of headache: A preliminary
study. Headache, 25: 444-446.
Tan, G., Kelly, J., Calhoun, W., Artymiak, K., & Ghusn,
H. (1997). Brain stimulation to improve cognition and mood of geriatric
patients with dementia. Presented at the Association for Applied
Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting. San Diego, CA.
Thomas, N. & Siever, D. (1989). The effect of repetitive audio/visual
stimulation on skeletomotor and vasomotor activity. Hypnosis: 4th European Congress
at Oxford. London: Whurr
Publishers.
Toman, J. (1941). Flicker potentials and the alpha rhythm
in man. Journal of Neurophysiology,
4: 51-61.
Townsend, R.E., Lubin, A., & Naitoh, P. (1975). Stabilization of alpha frequency by
sinusoidally modulated light. Electroencephalography
and Clinical Neurophysioloqy, 39: 515-518.
Trudeau, D.L., Moore,
J., Stockley, H., & Rubin, Y. (1999). A
pilot study of the effect of 18 Hz audio visual stimulation (AVS) on attention
and concentration symptoms and on quantitative EEG (QEEG) in long term chronic
fatigue (CFS). Journal
of Neurotherapy, 3: 76.
Twemlow, S.W., & Bowen, W.T. (1976). EEG biofeedback induced self-actualization in
alcoholics. Journal of Biofeedback,
3: 20-25.
Twemlow, S.W., Sizemore, D.G., & Bowen,
W.T. (1977). Biofeedback induced energy
redistribution in the alcoholic EEG. Journal
of Biofeedback, 3: 14-19.
Walter, V.J. & Walter, W.G. (1949). The central effects
of rhythmic sensory stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1: 57-86.
Williams, P. & West, M.
(1975). EEG responses to photic
stimulation in persons experienced in meditation. Electroencephalography
and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39: 519-522.